The cult of gender ideology is finally disintegrating

I’m going to bold some information that makes me think about human experimentation of the intelligence organization type.

Keep in mind the reality mentioned in the previous report

Which is why no one should be surprised that the Trans Ideology with it’s bizarre language and pronouns came out of and is associated with Universities and the edu-indoctrination complex.

We should understand that the mass mind experimentation done to destroy humanity during the so called pandemic have their roots in the very long history of intelligence ops, universities and mind control experimentation– Shattering minds. Destroying lives.

Here we see the Tavistock Institution playing it’s role in the trans mind control. As well as the edu indoctrination complex

Telegraph

a woman who should never have had any authority

Suzanne Moore 30 May 2023 • 7:00am

Susie Green, the former chief executive of Mermaids, who stood down “unexpectedly” last year, has been hiding in plain sight for so long that I sincerely hope we can see her clearly now. How this woman was ever allowed to have so much influence over vulnerable children, never mind medical professionals, is frankly disturbing. She is a former IT consultant with no medical training – unless you count the fact that she won 2016’s Sparkle Diversity Champion of the Year as a specialised qualification. I certainly don’t. The story of how much power she came to have remains shocking.

An IT consultant, well why not, people believe Bill Gates is a doctor of medicine, when really he’s just someone with lots of money that he uses to gain influence and power

The organisation she ran was once not controversial; it was a support group for children and parents of kids with gender issues until she got her hands on it. It became an activist and lobby group receiving hundreds of thousands of pounds in lottery funding and grants and was hired by the Department for Education to provide training on “gender identity” in schools. As with Stonewall, it had huge reach into key institutions and the usual gormless celebrity support.

We now find that Green herself had direct influence on policy at the gender identity development service (GIDS) at the Tavistock. After being told that the Tavistock did not have any records of meeting with Green, when threatened by court action, miraculously it found 300 pages of them.

Yes, that Tavistock- Messing with minds and redirecting societies

They reveal that Green spoke directly to the director Dr Polly Carmichael, had advisory roles on two studies and – most scandalous of all – could refer children for treatment at the clinic even when their own GPs had repeatedly advised against it. The Cass Review, remember, effectively shut down GIDS as it was not fit for purpose.

GIDS was in turmoil and dealing with a new cohort of distressed young women with gender dysphoria; the number of girls jumped 5,000 per cent in a seven-year period. Cass found there were no long-term follow-ups even though nearly every child who was referred for prescribed puberty blockers went on to cross-sex hormones [which are used to transition from biological gender to desired gender].

A 5000 percent increase in 7 years and no one is questioning the level of indoctrination at play? The level of abuse doled out on these children? Really?

Puberty blockers are controversial because we don’t have enough longitudinal studies to really understand their impact, which is why several countries such as Sweden and Norway have stopped them. The NHS site says they are not simply reversible. Research is showing that when distressed teenagers are given therapy, they no longer want to change gender and many accept they are gay. Puberty blockers tend to be the first step on a medical pathway that leads to cross-sex hormones and surgery. The other issue which Green should know well, is that if given too early, genitalia do not develop enough to make satisfactory “new models”. These kids may well lose their fertility and any chance of sexual pleasure.

Ask a “trans activist” and they’ll tell you puberty blockers are not controversial because they are repeating the lies, unquestioningly, they’ve been told by people pushing agendas that have nothing to do with concern or care for children- This is social engineering (the use of centralized planning in an attempt to manage social change and regulate the future development and behavior of a society.)

There is an infamous Ted Talk and other YouTube videos of Green talking of what happened to her own son. (What she did to her own son) He wanted a Barbie Rapunzel and other girl things. Her husband, she claims, didn’t like this “girly” boy. Later, he was whizzed off to the States at age 12 for puberty blockers and at 14 was out on oestrogen. He spent seven hours on his 16th birthday on an operating table in Thailand in what is euphemistically called “gender-affirming” surgery.

Green explains this meant “basically use[ing] the skin from the penis to create a vagina. And she hadn’t developed through full puberty so, not to put too fine a point on it, there wasn’t much to work with”. That is the work of puberty blockers.

This operation was done in Thailand as it is illegal to do that to a 16-year-old here. Indeed, it is now illegal in Thailand. If this well-known information is not a red flag, I don’t know what is. Yet this woman was, we now know, given carte blanche to overrule psychiatrists and medics and to push her dubious agenda. What is that agenda? It is the lucrative invention of the trans child. I say lucrative, because in the States, billions of dollars are projected to be made by surgeons and drug companies with lifelong medicalisation being offered to 13-year-olds who have been diagnosed sometimes as young as four.

Green herself has now chummed up with Dr Helen Webberley of GenderGP, who was once suspended, and who sells cross-sex hormones to under-16s, which is not allowed in the UK. This is done online with no counselling.

None of this is really about the trans rights of adults. It is about the pushing of extreme gender ideology on to distressed children. Any basic model of safeguarding has gone out of the window. It is a complete negation of the duty to ‘Do No Harm’ and at its centre is a woman who should never, ever have been given any authority.

I really hope that for Susie Green, the game is finally up.

I hope for the sake of all the yet to be mutilated and traumatized children this abusive mutilating exercise in social control is put to rest

This woman, this Susie Green, clearly has Munchausen Syndrome

“a psychological disorder marked by attention-seeking behavior by a caregiver through those who are in their care”

She got lots of attention, fame, and money from mutilating her own child and turning him into a marketable product- That’s my opinion, anyway. That’s how I see it, so that’s how it’s being called.