The US, of course, has confirmed that it will stand with and defend Israel through thick and thin regardless of what Netanyahu does. The US Navy has deployed destroyers in the Gulf and the eastern Mediterranean, as well as the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier, amphibious assault teams and more than 4,000 marines and sailors.
Looking at the situation from a strategic perspective — and not from the angle of a strike and counterstrike to save face — the question arises about whether or not Iran and its proxies are ready for an all-out war with Israel.
The short answer to that is no, they are not.
For Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has no personal interest in reaching a deal to release prisoners, ending the genocide of the Palestinians or seeing stability in the region. Stopping the war means that his political career will be over, and he will be held accountable for his actions and perhaps get a prison sentence (he has been indicted on corruption charges). Netanyahu thus benefits from continuing the war and expanding its scope to include other parties, especially Iran, in the hope that this will save him from his own legal crisis and drag the US into the fighting.
However, the priority for Iran since the 1979 Islamic revolution has been to protect itself in the face of occasional regime-change efforts led by Washington, and this means that it must make every effort not to go to war with the US or Israel. This is one of the reasons why Iran has been arming its proxies in the region as an advanced line of defence and to buy it time to develop a nuclear bomb or reach a deal with Washington that guarantees what it wants. As a result, talk of an all-out war or direct confrontation led by Iran is almost completely false.
Iran knows that such a war would be very costly and would probably end in its destruction and regime change. Moreover, Iran has no interest in intervening at a time when Netanyahu is drowning in Gaza, nor does it have an interest in confronting the US at a time when the negotiating table is being re-arranged to discuss the nuclear file. It is also preparing for the return of Trump to the White House, and this means that it must not to throw Hezbollah to the lions now, as that would lead to the destruction of both the movement and Lebanon at a time that does not serve Tehran’s agenda.
As such, Iran’s calculations are not related to Palestine, Gaza or Hamas.
They are secondary and are being used like other cards to try to strengthen its regional position, its negotiating position and its popularity after a decade of ongoing involvement against the Syrian people and other Arab nations. There is no doubt that such a move also has costs, but they are relatively few and acceptable given the results that Tehran hopes to get. That’s why, when Iran wanted to save face in April, it informed all those concerned, including the Americans, of the precise details of the response against Israel, enabling all of its missiles and drones to be shot down.
Netanyahu has gone too far in embarrassing Iran, though, so Tehran has to respond but it faces a dilemma. Not responding encourages Netanyahu to continue his aggression, assassinations and strikes inside Iran in an attempt to lure it into a war in which it has no interest. However, an effective response almost inevitably means war against Israel and the US, which is what Netanyahu wants, and will likely end with the destruction of Iran and the change of its regime. Everything between not responding and a real response is apparently acceptable to all parties and within the rules of the new game. Of course, there is a lot of scope for miscalculations, a serious possibility in light of the ongoing escalation, but the strategic calculations of all concerned suggest that this will not happen.
No major war? Just a minor war? Or will the situation get out of control, entirely?
4 replies on “There will be no MAJOR war between Israel and Iran”
Hi Penny:
Sometimes what is not in an article is as important or even more important than what is in the article. The word that is missing in this article is “Russia”. The article talks about a war between Iran and Israel and the USA. I agree that there will be no such war. The war that could happen though, is a war between Israel and the USA against Iran and Russia. That would be a horse of a different colour. The USA has targets, oh, I mean ships in the area. Are they vulnerable to hypersonic missiles?
It was reported that Sergei Shoigu had been to Iran. And the response had been discussed. What this entails? I don’t know.
Here’s a report that’s not excessively manipulative in it’s writing/reporting
Some stuff is over the top.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/top-russian-security-official-shoigu-arrives-iran-interfax-says-2024-08-05/
All day yesterday (Aug 6 ) as I pondered the escalations towards total war I had the eerie feeling that I was forgetting something about the date, like I had forgotten a friend’s birthday or something. This morning I realized what I had forgotten. Hiroshima Day…79 years ago…
Never have I felt it more likely that those weapons will be used again…
Did you see the news about Japan?
https://thecradle.co/articles-id/26318
Western ambassadors to Japan announced that they would not attend an upcoming ceremony commemorating the victims of the US 1945 atomic bombing of Nagasaki because the city’s mayor did not invite the Israeli ambassador.
This includes the ambassadors from the US, the UK, France, Italy, and Australia.
Canada followed
https://www.cjpme.org/pr_2024_08_07_nagasaki
Montreal, August 7, 2024 — Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME) is outraged by reports that Canada’s Ambassador to Japan will be boycotting Friday’s memorial service for the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki over the fact that Israel was not invited. The City of Nagasaki had declined to invite the Israeli Ambassador, whose government is involved in the mass killing of civilians in Gaza.