Paxlovid and “rebound “ Covid keep the Pandemic Ball Rolling.

Talk about keeping the vicious circle going and going..

Vicious Circle- “a sequence of reciprocal cause and effect in which two or more elements intensify and aggravate each other, leading inexorably to a worsening of the situation.”

Dr Gortler asks if there is some unholy alliance between the Biden White House, the FDA and Pfizer. There is an unholy alliance and it adheres no matter what party is occupying the White house

My question goes more like this.. Is there some sort of unholy union between the FDA, Pfizer, and the NIH
I don’t want to play the partisan card. But, I like the line of questioning. Read on..

Why Has The White House Spent Billions On It?

Dr. David Gortler is a pharmacologist, pharmacist, and an FDA and health policy fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He was a professor of pharmacology and biotechnology at the Yale University School of Medicine, where he also served at Yale’s Bioethicist Center, and was an FDA medical officer who was later appointed by the White House as senior advisor to the FDA commissioner for drug safety, FDA science policy, and FDA regulatory affairs. He is a columnist at Forbes, where he writes on drug safety, health care and FDA policy.

Shortly after President Joe Biden touted his recovery from Covid last week, he once again tested positive for the virus, in a rebound case that is often associated with the drug Paxlovid, which Biden was taking.

Countless Americans who have taken Pfizer’s Paxlovid following a Covid infection have experienced what everyone is calling “rebound Covid.” Rebound Covid is a recurrence of the virus that occurs in a person who has already recovered from Covid, many times shortly after completing Paxlovid.

What does it mean?

Clinical scientists are offering all kinds of different theories, but no definitive explanations for the “rebound” Paxlovid phenomenon have been established. It’s a mystery and regardless of what it is, it can’t be good.

Why Make High-Risk Patients Sick Twice?

Rebound Covid post-Paxlovid raises a critical public health and drug safety concern. According to the NIH, only high-risk populations are supposed to get Paxlovid, but taking Paxlovid sometimes opens those same high-risk patients to a rebound infection with Covid. In some cases, the rebound Covid symptoms are worse, placing the same high-risk patients in more severe danger.

One doesn’t need to be a physician to know that having a high-risk patient get sick twice is worse than once.

Why is Biden still advocating for Paxlovid’s use, as recently as last week? The White House doesn’t have a political option. It must either a) admit failure or b) ignore public health.

The White House foolishly chose to pay Pfizer $10.6 billion for Paxlovid, based on a highly preliminary “pilot study” showing nearly 90 percent effectiveness which later dissolved into its study failing and being voluntarily discontinued by Pfizer prior to its completion. Paxlovid failed its trial endpoints when compared to a placebo group.

Perhaps the Biden White House didn’t realize that informal preliminary pilot studies are never conclusive and “results” need confirmation with a formal clinical trial. Regardless, the White House did not wait until the formal trial was complete before committing $10.6 billion in taxpayer dollars. It’s a $10.6 billion fortune down the drain.
Spending Billions on a Questionable Drug

The White House’s actions are inexcusable. Not only do they refuse to acknowledge that the drug was a failure and that they had prematurely and inappropriately spent a vast fortune on something ineffective and potentially dangerous, but they continue to promote Paxlovid’s use!

Rather than protecting patients, the White House is choosing to sacrifice the well-being of at-risk patients and promote a drug that Pfizer itself gave up on before the clinical trial was even completed.

A Similar Story to Vaccines and Boosters

In case this feels familiar, that’s because it is. Americans have seen the exact same thing before regarding Covid-19 vaccine adverse effects. While the federal government scolded Americans for not getting vaccines and boosters, they simultaneously remained silent on adverse events and deliberately complacent in suppressing them.

Even if Paxlovid was effective, do patients need it? At this point, the same question goes for Covid-19 vaccines and boosters. The dominant variants today typically produce a milder infection; most people get minimal to moderate cold-like symptoms from Covid infections whether vaccinated or not.

Despite all of that, the White House is still endlessly seeking to purchase more vaccines. By July 29, the White House had committed to purchasing a total of 171 million Covid-19 vaccine doses for the new omicron mutations of Covid-19, despite having zero clinical trial evidence of safety or efficacy — e.g., exactly like they did with Paxlovid!

It’s also telling that many Americans aren’t interested in boosters. If they had been shown to work, people would be taking them — but they haven’t, so people aren’t. In the U.S. alone, the government has been forced to throw out more than 82 million vaccine/booster doses, yet Americans aren’t dropping dead everywhere. Even leftist academic centers can’t hide objective epidemiological evidence coming out of hospitals in recent months that illustrate record lows in Covid-19-related hospital ICU admissions.

Digging Their Heels in Deeper

The combination of promoting endless boosters of an vaccine that fails to prevent infection or transmission, along with promoting Pfizer’s Paxlovid despite its ineffectiveness and mysterious “rebound” pharmacology, makes me wonder about something that I have thought about for a long time, especially as a former senior FDA official: Is there some sort of unholy union between the FDA, Pfizer, and the Biden White House? Pfizer spends millions in lobbying and campaign contributions. Its revolving door with government health agencies is concerning. Would the Biden White House dare place Americans’ public health at risk in the name of politics? I pray the answer is no and also hope that I am wrong, perhaps missing part of the story, but a compelling amount of data points to my suspicions being accurate.

The White House needs to be more careful about funneling fortunes to Big Pharma for unproven, and possibly unsafe or unneeded, drugs. Americans should very carefully consider what they are hearing from the White House, its officials, and all federal alphabet agencies about the Paxlovid “wonder drug.”

Dr Gortler asks if there is some unholy alliance between the Biden White House, the FDA and Pfizer. There is an unholy alliance and it adheres no matter what party is occupying the White house

My question? Is there some sort of unholy union between the FDA, Pfizer, and the NIH or NIAD

3 replies on “Paxlovid and “rebound “ Covid keep the Pandemic Ball Rolling.”

Hi Penny: The below might answer your question … (although I suspect you already knew the answer;-)

NIH, FDA spearhead broad partnership to speed gene therapy research
Oct. 28, 2021
“The National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration are banding together with drugmakers and nonprofits to speed the development of gene therapies for rare diseases.”

Not to mention that heads of state (including Trudeau) are making money hand over fist in the stock market. In case you hadn’t seen this video (I hadn’t untll now):

Leave a Reply