I’d seen this news earlier. WaPo put it all in one article, linked below
While eating supper with hubby this evening and chatting about current events – I wondered aloud how it was that Zelensky was still in power? How is it the Ukrainians haven’t run this man out of town? But then I wonder why it is Trudeau is still leading Canada as well?
In the very early days of this military action I’d hoped for diplomacy. And it looked for a short time that Zelensky might have been willing to take this road. But, then he took this sharp U turn and things became bizarre and deadly for Ukrainians.
Ukraine is running out of ammunition as prospects dim on the battlefield
The Ukrainians are still fighting back, but they are
running out of ammunition and suffering casualties at a far higher rate than in the initial stages of the war. Around 200 Ukrainian soldiers are now being killed every day, up from 100 late last month, an aide to President Volodymyr Zelensky told the BBC on Friday
— meaning that as many as1,000 Ukrainians are being taken out of the fight every day, including those who are injured.
The overall trajectory of the war has unmistakably shifted away from one of unexpectedly dismal Russian failures and tilted in favor of Russia as the demonstrably stronger force.
Ukrainian and U.S. hopes that the new supplies of Western weaponry would enable Ukraine to regain the initiative and eventually retake the estimated 20 percent of Ukrainian territory captured by Russia since its Feb. 24 invasion are starting to look premature, said Oleksandr V. Danylyuk, an adviser to the Ukrainian government on defense and intelligence issues.
“The strategies and tactics of the Russians are completely different right now. They are being much more successful,” he said. “They have more resources than us and they are not in a rush.”
“There’s much less space for optimism right now,” he added.
As troop fatalities mounted, the surviving soldiers felt “more motivated to hold our position,” Tihonenko said. To retreat after their comrades were killed defending the town, he said, would have felt like treating their deaths as insignificant.
But eventually, t
he defensive line was no longer effective, the two men said. With more than one-third of their force killed, the remaining soldiers had no choice but to pull back
.“Sometimes you feel down,” Tihonenko said. “But then you realize war is war — and you have to finish it.”
But
the odds against
the Ukrainians are starting to look overwhelming, said Danylyuk, the government adviser.
“The Russians are using long-range artillery against us, often without any response, because we don’t have the means,” he said. “They can attack from dozens of kilometers away and we can’t fire back. We know all the coordinates for all their important targets, but we don’t have the means to attack.”
Ukraine has now almost completely run out of ammunition for the Soviet-era weapons systems that were the mainstay of its arsena
l, and the Eastern European countries that maintained the same systems have run out of surplus supplies to donate, Danylyuk said. Ukraine urgently needs to shift to longer-range and more sophisticated Western systems, but those have only recently been committed, and in insufficient quantities to match Russia’s immense firepower, he said.
Russia is firing as many as 50,000 artillery rounds a day into Ukrainian positions, and the Ukrainians can only hit back with around 5,000 to 6,000 rounds a day,
he said. The United States has committed to deliver 220,000 rounds of ammunition — enough to match Russian firepower for around four days.
The Russians have meanwhile adapted their tactics in ways that have let them take full advantage of their firepower by remaining at a distance from Ukrainian positions, pounding them relentlessly, then taking territory once the Ukrainians have been forced to retreat.
The Russians are also doing a better job of combining their arms, of using close air support and deploying dismounted infantry, said Rob Lee, a former U.S. Marine now with the Foreign Policy Research Institute.
Russia has not released casualty figures since March. “But when you look at what’s happening, I’d be shocked if the Russians are sustaining casualties anywhere close to what the Ukrainians are right now,” Alperovitch said.
7 replies on ““The Odds Against Ukraine Are Looking Overwhelming” Ammo Running Out- Prospects Dim”
If I followed it correctly. Zelensky is a comedian. Now making this assertion might seem that its meant to belittle him, but that is not what I am after.
A good comedian is also a good story teller. Keeping the audience engaged, knowing what to avoid and what to tell. The following point to keep in mind is that this person was probably massaged into this position and probably has a get-out-jail card promised probably by the Americans. If in the end of this, Ukraine ends up split.
Zelensky will probably end up in Poland or America and hailed as heroic figure who did his best against the mad Russians. And the sacrifices made by the Ukrainians not to be forgotten and used as a reminder that the Russians are vicious, ruthless etcetera.
Like leaders of old, putting the people they ought to protect in jeopardy by fulfilling a role he was assigned to. In the end it seems like it will have played out like I thought it would. The Russian war-machine got a kick-start, and I am half-convinced that the Russians won’t stop at Ukraine. This doesn’t mean that they will jump into another battle after Ukraine, but they will be building up their capabilities and forces, and try to pull Turkiye to its side.
In the meanwhile, Europe will try to bolster its forces….. but……. You know. Its people has grown soft and have different priorities. If my feeling are correct, Europe has the potential to muster up a force to resist the Russians, but those who can are more of the feeling. Eeeh, Fighting for what Europe represents. Yeah thanks but no thanks. Have fun dealing with the Russians <_<.
I mean sure its all speculation, but you know. People are vicious beings, they just express them differently.
“The following point to keep in mind is that this person was probably massaged into this position and probably has a get-out-jail card promised probably by the Americans.”
I could see that being the case.-
“If in the end of this, Ukraine ends up split.”
This could have been avoided had Zelensky abided by previous agreements- Still, I’m less inclined to think Russia necessarily wants this outcome- They’d be okay with an independent state within Ukrainian
borders- Think Transnistria or South Osetia.. and Abkhazia.
However it will have been Zelensky that sacrificed the Ukrainian people. Zelensky and Biden led US.
“Zelensky will probably end up in Poland or America and hailed as heroic figure who did his best against the mad Russians”
I could see that- including the negative meme about Russians.
NATO/Poland are more likely to annex a chunk of Ukraine- and perhaps this was what they were after all along?
speculative.
“I am half-convinced that the Russians won’t stop at Ukraine.”
I’m not convinced they will go any further at this point.
Regarding Turkiye ( I got to get used to that)
The name change is very suggestive that they are looking to central asia more then to the west-
The name change has probably to do more with the association they kept making with the bird turkey. It annoyed a certain group of people. Same reason I kept using Turkiye in most of my posts.
“Still, I’m less inclined to think Russia necessarily wants this outcome- They’d be okay with an independent state within Ukrainian”
Before the war, probably. But things changed now. When blood of soldiers starts flowing. the old solutions are not applicable anymore. Ukraine is getting depleted, but its costing the Russians.
To leave Ukraine as it is, is just a risk which can cause a redo of this entire thing again. And when it comes to these kind of issues the Russians don’t like risks.
Like the circassian genocide. Or stalin era move of native’s to siberia because they went against the ussr, causing millions to perish there.
Penny this might be me, but the way you look at Russia is almost as if you are unaware of the bloody past caused by both imperial Russia and communist Russia. (But than again this is that one thing which we not on the same line, I can leave it to time will tell)
“Penny this might be me, but the way you look at Russia is almost as if you are unaware of the bloody past caused by both imperial Russia and communist Russia”
I may be less aware or have less in depth knowledge of these things, but, do have some. This may be geographical too (you may be closer geographically, so steeped deeper in the history)
That said bloody pasts are everywhere to be found.. even here in Canada. The US. In ancient cultures. Etc., Sadly, bloody pasts are not unique to Russia. Imperial or otherwise
You think the name change was about the association with the bird?
Maybe. I’d never thought of that though?
“That said bloody pasts are everywhere to be found.. even here in Canada. The US. In ancient cultures. Etc., Sadly, bloody pasts are not unique to Russia. Imperial or otherwise”
I know, but its the manner and extend in which those acts are committed. You could argue that for the sake of end its justified to use any means, Which would include culling the population in any way possible to get a dominant position and protect its future, that is how the Russian federation came where it is now. But this is also an “operandus modi”,
For the sake of the argument I am limiting it to UK, USA and Russia. These three Are not so different in my view. The only difference is that UK and USA are better at sugarcoating. That is also why I feel there is a bigger distrust towards UK and USA than towards Russia. Once you see trough that façade you are disconnected from the accepted view and you have no choice but to take the other view.
I have the same issue, I know what UK and USA did. And I feel like I should stand with Russia or at least give moral support. But I am also aware of Russia itself. I continuously have to keep reminding myself that the leadership of Russia is no better than the others and the length they are prepared to go.
Ergo why I don’t take sides in this conflict. The only side I take are the innocents who are blown up. And for the sake clarifying, that doesn’t mean I am choosing country/leadership or whatever. Just innocents in general.
Hey Kaz:
” The only side I take are the innocents who are blown up. And for the sake clarifying, that doesn’t mean I am choosing country/leadership or whatever. Just innocents in general.”
I get that. 100%. As has been stated Ukraine didn’t have to be the way it is turning out. In some ways I see Russia and Turkey have similar issues on the borders.
The west wants to pretend both/neither nations have legit security interests- yet somehow the US/Canada and UK have ‘security interests’ on borders they are no where near? There is that bizarre disconnect from reality that persists.
“The west wants to pretend both/neither nations have legit security interests- yet somehow the US/Canada and UK have ‘security interests’ on borders they are no where near? There is that bizarre disconnect from reality that persists.”
They drive on countries which are exploitable. No exploitable nations means a security risk form themselves. I know I am removing alot of detail with this. But that is how it looks to me