Microplastics (Face Masks) Deep in the Lungs of Living People- Lung Cancer Risk Increased

This outcome was so predictable. So easily predictable. That, as a point of fact, this was brought to my readers attention in January 2021 at my big tech censored blog. YES, January 2021!

January 04/2021: That was 16 months ago. My readers were made aware….

original url

Previous studies about the risk of plastics discovered microplastics in the lung tissue of some patients who died of lung cancer in the 1990s. Since then, other studies have examined the potential lung damage caused by plastic materials.

According to research, plastic degrades slowly, so once in the lungs, it tends to stay there and build up in volume.

Some studies have found that the immune system can attack these foreign objects, causing prolonged inflammation that can lead to diseases such as cancer.

Open your eyes- engage your brain-

The most recent news from the Guardian

Particles discovered in tissue of 11 out of 13 patients undergoing surgery, with polypropylene (face masks of all kinds) and PET most common

Microplastic pollution has been discovered lodged deep in the lungs of living people for the first time. The particles were found in almost all the samples analysed.

Do you think two years of mask wearing could have anything to do with it? Let’s see..ah, no rocket science necessary. Obviously, yes.

The scientists said microplastic pollution was now ubiquitous across the planet, making human exposure unavoidable and meaning “there is an increasing concern regarding the hazards” to health.

Samples were taken from tissue removed from 13 patients undergoing surgery and microplastics were found in 11 cases. The most common particles were polypropylene, used in plastic packaging (FACE MASKS) and pipes, and PET, used in bottles. Two previous studies had found microplastics at similarly high rates in lung tissue taken during autopsies.

People were already known to breathe in the tiny particles,( FACE MASKS) as well as consuming them via food and water. Workers exposed to high levels of microplastics are also known to have developed disease.(FACE MASKS)

(FACE MASKS) Microplastics were detected in human blood for the first time in March, showing the particles can travel around the body and may lodge in organs. The impact on health is as yet unknown. But researchers are concerned as microplastics cause damage to human cells in the laboratory and air pollution particles are already known to enter the body and cause millions of early deaths a year.(FACE MASKS)

(FACE MASKS) “We did not expect to find the highest number of particles in the lower regions of the lungs, or particles of the sizes we found,” said Laura Sadofsky at Hull York medical school in the UK,a senior author of the study. “It is surprising as the airways are smaller in the lower parts of the lungs and we would have expected particles of these sizes to be filtered out or trapped before getting this deep.”(FACE MASKS)

“This data provides an important advance in the field of air pollution, microplastics and human health,” she said. The information could be used to create realistic conditions for laboratory experiments to determine health impacts.

A US study of lung cancer patients in 1998 found plastic and plant fibres (such as cotton) in more than 100 samples. In cancerous tissue, 97% of samples contained the fibres and in non-cancerous samples, 83% were contaminated.

A recent review assessed cancer risk and concluded: “More detailed research on how micro- and nanoplastics affect the structures and processes of the human body, and whether and how they can transform cells and induce carcinogenesis, is urgently needed, particularly in light of the exponential increase in plastic production.”


The msm won’t write those words. I will and did back in January 2021

Should we be wearing masks? Are they safe? Do they block viruses as has been claimed? Will we have an explosion of lung cancer down the road from all the inhaled petrochemical plastic fibres embedded in our lungs?


Please share this news. People need to know.

8 replies on “Microplastics (Face Masks) Deep in the Lungs of Living People- Lung Cancer Risk Increased”

Looks more like Geert VandenBosche was right!
How does the virus evolve inside an infected person – we commence this story with a new demonstration in a vaccinated patient, and relapse to a well-documented history in COVID-19 patients, and how antibodies can be contributing to such viral evolution. This also leads us to a hypothesis as to why evolving variants might show up in wastewater prior to taking over a population. We conclude with how the BA2 variant of the Omicron is different from the BA1 variant, demonstrating continuous uninterrupted evolution of the virus.
From Mergenomics:

What I am wondering about is.

Is this just the general rule with all facemasks, or is it due to the mass production. Or wear since people use a single disposable mask multiple times.

Because high-tech and Food sectors have been using face masks to avoid contaminating the products. And I am sure those are not cotton based but also from plastic ?

Hi Kaz:;

From my previous post at the censored blog it seems all masks were implicated- some more damaging then others.

I can’t speak to the high tech sector- but do know in the food industries local to myself the workers don’t wear masks- they wear hair nets –

Hubby has done maintenance work in places of food production and he’s never known of or seen face masks worn- this was pre covid- so can’t speak to anything since- Hair nets- always. Face masks not to our knowledge

The Guardian didn’t mention face masks and yet its the elephant in the room- it can’t be ignored

Key points by Geert Vanden Bossche:

1. Omicron is not sterilised and is mutating rapidly within the vaccinated.

2. This immune pressure WILL cause it to become more virulent and deadly. It is already highly infectious.

3. The vaccinated will be prime targets for the new virulent and deadly mutation.

4. The public health system will become over run with sick and dying vaxxed people.

5. Timing for this to start, within the next 2 to 3 months.

6. The ONLY option left, on a mass scale, is IVERMECTIN and HQC for the vaxxed.

Question: Will public health go for the Ivermectin solution?

Answer: They will have NO other option….unless they want the vaxxed population to die off?

Bottom line: Stock up on Ivermectin. Get ready for more lockdowns and madness, on a massive scale, in highly vaxxed countries.

And Get out of the big cities, whilst you still can.

Second question: How much new money will Central Banks throw at this?

Answer: Their balance sheets could double again, from here.

I don’t know about no.6

I haven’t delved too deep into those, but they are only to slow down the replication of the virus, they don’t destroy it. If the body can’t clean it up than the virus replication will just increase after the effects of those 2 drugs runs off no? That would mean a continuous prescription, which would be ironic since the public made fun of it due to 3rd party influence.

Normally I would say a reset of their immune system should do something, but their bodies are also contaminated with particles. Can they even properly refresh with that. (fyi a 72h fast should refresh one’s immune system according to a paper)

Leave a Reply