US Halts Antibody Treatments over Efficacy Concerns- But Continues to Push Leaky Vaxx?

Here’s my thinking..

The antibody treatments have been quite successful. Most probably people were preferring them as a treatment over the toxic jab. Making the technocratic control/tracking tyranny most unhappy. So they halted the use of these treatments. That’s a form of coercion my friends.

U.S. authorities on Thursday halted the distribution of Covid-19 treatments from Regeneron (ticker: REGN) and Eli Lilly (LLY), raising doubts over their efficacy against the Omicron variant.

The Food and Drug Admininistration (FDA) and the office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), in a joint statement said that the data show that “it is unlikely” that Eli Lilly‘s bamlanivimab and etesevimab administered together or Regeneron’s REGEN-COV “will retain activity against this variant.”

Yet we know the jab retains no activity against any version of this virus. Was always ‘leaky’ Doesn’t stop transmission. Doesn’t prevent deaths or serious illness. We’ve got a ton of real world data verifying the ineffectiveness of the jab.

I realize that lie of impeding transmission has been spread far, wide and extremely liberally


“The monoclonal antibody therapy is a valuable tool for us when treating COVID-19, but in no way is it a substitute for vaccinations,” said Stuart Cohen, chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases and director of hospital epidemiology and infection control. “Early treatment with the monoclonal antibody therapy can reduce the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization or death, but it will not protect you against catching the virus and the vaccine does just that.”

Mr Stuart Cohen is obviously a prevaricator (a person who speaks falsely; liar.)There was never an iota of proof that the jab stopped transmission. Or that it was going to end the pandemic. Never.
So stopping the use of antibody treatments is clearly being done to push the jab.
Yet more coercion.

Thank goodness the report below was recently moved here!

Scientists Debate How Much to LOWER THE BAR on Covid-19 Vaccine Potential- Disconcerting

ClinicOngoing clinical trials are primarily designed to show whether Covid-19 vaccine candidates prevent any symptoms of the diseasewhich could be as minor as a sore throat or a trials to test

Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Then Good: CCCA

4 replies on “US Halts Antibody Treatments over Efficacy Concerns- But Continues to Push Leaky Vaxx?”

It is neither a prayer nor a petition, but an early medieval, formulaic legal proclamation in Aramaic that absolves Jews in advance from all vows made from one Yom Kippur to the next. These are vows that do not affect the interests of others—vows that might be made rashly, impulsively, unwittingly, or without due consideration of all possible ramifications. Nor does kol nidrei concern transgressions committed against human beings, for which only forgiveness by injured parties can provide atonement (see in Mishna Yoma: VIII). Still, varying degrees of discomfort have surrounded the text ever since its adoption. Indeed, as early as the post-talmudic period of the 6th to11th centuries, some ge’onim (heads of the academies during that time frame) questioned it on the grounds that it might be misunderstood in terms of ethical principles. At certain times in Jewish history—especially within the Czarist Empire—it was even deemed advisable to provide a prefatory explanation that amounted to a de facto disclaimer. Among certain modern rabbinical circles, beginning with the Emancipation era in western and west Central Europe, uneasiness with the text grew.

So, it’s like a free pass given as needed for whatever reason?

Leave a Reply