Categories
Uncategorized

Analysis: Ukraine’s bold and risky gamble in Kursk

There’s quite a lot of sensational reporting on this situation which isn’t what I’m after. The piece linked and excerpted below seems more measured. So, share some thoughts on this article from FDD’s Longwarjournal

And read entirely at the link.

I’m going to put this news here also, because there has to be a connection– Was this operation timed to coincide with.. US announces 125 million in additional aid??

The United States on August 9 announced $125 million in new military aid for Kyiv as Ukrainian forces push ahead with a surprise offensive inside Russian territory. The aid package underscores “our unwavering commitment to [Ukraine] as they continue to battle back against Russian aggression,

Longwarjournal

Now on its fourth day, Ukraine’s surprise offensive in Russia’s Kursk region is a daring gambit likely intended to divert Russian forces and snatch back the war’s momentum. But it also comes with major risks for a Ukrainian military short on reserves and struggling to hold back Russian advances in Donetsk Oblast.

What we know so far

Much about the Ukrainian offensive is still unclear. Kyiv has remained tight-lipped, and Ukrainian units have released scant battlefield footage. What little information is available comes chiefly from Russian-released videos as well as a whirlwind of unconfirmed—and often contradictory—reports on Telegram.

Here is what we currently know: Following an artillery bombardment, Ukrainian forces attacked across the border between the Sumy and Kursk regions on the morning of August 6. They initially advanced in two directions: east to the border town of Sudzha and north toward the town of Korenevo.

Though the attacking force’s precise size and composition remain unclear, the offensive is certainly larger in scale and ambition than Ukraine’s previous cross-border operations. Those raids were conducted by units subordinate to Ukrainian military intelligence, whereas this offensive includes regular forces.

Since the Ukrainian military intelligence units are involved then so is the US. Without question.

One officer in the unit was Kyrylo Budanov, now the general leading Ukraine’s military intelligence.

The direct connection between US and Ukraine intelligence- Budanov.

At this point, Ukraine has probably committed battalions from at least several different brigades. The attacking forces appear to have mainly included mechanized and motorized infantry, plus some tanks along with engineering vehicles to clear mines and other obstacles. Ukrainian self-propelled artillery seems to be supporting the advancing forces.

Considering the lack of Ukrainian forces this is definitely a gamble

Although there had been warnings about a Ukrainian buildup in Sumy Oblast in the days prior to the offensive, the attack evidently caught Russia off guard. Ukrainian operational security seems to have been tight. Russia left the border weakly defended, protected mainly by conscript and border guard units. (Note that in the Russian system, conscripts—people completing their obligatory one year of military service—are distinct from mobilized troops and prohibited from fighting inside Ukraine.) The Russian defense was prepared to stop small-scale raids but not a sizeable force. Ukraine exploited this surprise with a highly mobile force that advanced rapidly into Russian territory, overrunning or bypassing defensive positions near the border.

Ukrainian forces surrounded and ultimately captured some 50 Russian troops at the Sudzha border checkpoint. Ukraine reportedly met minimal resistance at the nearby village of Oleshnya and also surrounded Russian troops in Gornal, south of Sudzha. The Ukrainians quickly reached Sudzha’s environs and appear to have taken at least part of the town. But a large chunk of the Ukrainian force seems to have turned left at Sudzha, pressing northward along the road connecting that town to Lgov. As of August 8, Ukrainian troops had reached Malaya Loknya, a village roughly 13 kilometers from the border, though they apparently met at least some resistance there.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces pressed north from the area around the villages of Dar’ino and Serdlikovo after reportedly meeting some initial resistance. Footage released on social media indicates that by August 7, the Ukrainians had progressed at least 12 kilometers from the border to the area around Novoivanovka.

Some Russian Telegram channels have reported fighting near Korenevo to the northwest, Anastas’evka and Kromskie Byki to the north, and Bol’shoe Soldatskoe northeast of Sudzha. Some of these claims are disputed, however. These reports may reflect Ukrainian sabotage-reconnaissance groups operating ahead of the main force.

Video footage indicates Russia has used attack helicopters and Su-25 attack aircraft, artillery fire (including Krasnopol laser-guided shells), Lancet loitering munition strikes, and Iskander-M ballistic missile strikes to support ground troops trying to stem the Ukrainian advance. In addition, reports by the Ukrainian General Staff and the Sumy regional government, along with Russianreleased footage, indicate Su-34 strike fighters have launched many dozens of glide bombs at targets in the Sumy and Kursk regions.

Russia has begun dispatching forces to try to contain and roll back the Ukrainian advance, though it remains unclear exactly which units Moscow has sent. What is known is that a Chechen spetsnaz detachment that had been fighting in northern Kharkiv Oblast claims to have redeployed to Kursk on August 6. Russia reportedly also sent forces from the “Pyatnashka” Brigade, which had been fighting at Chasiv Yar in Donetsk Oblast, as well as a detachment of former Wagner Group fighters

Russian tanks were seen moving on August 7 and 8. Their tactical symbols indicate they came from Russia’s “Sever” grouping, responsible for northern Kharkiv Oblast and Russia’s Bryansk, Kursk, and Belgorod regions. Moscow probably had at least some available reserves in those regions or elsewhere in Russia. Russian heavy equipment is likely arriving in Kursk Oblast in greater numbers as of August 9. Ukraine has sought to interdict the Russian reinforcements, in one case, destroying a truck column carrying infantry near Rylsk.

Ukrainian objectives

  • For Ukraine, this offensive likely has multiple aims. First, Kyiv seeks to compel Russia to divert forces from other fronts, much like Moscow’s Kharkiv offensive in May 2024 did to Ukraine. This goal could be to relieve pressure in Donetsk Oblast, where Ukrainian troops are struggling to hold back Russian advances, or to enable Ukraine to recapture Russian-controlled territory in northern Kharkiv Oblast.
  • Second, Kyiv likely sought to reinvigorate Ukrainian morale and Western confidence in Ukraine, reversing the downbeat narrative that has taken hold over the last 10 months. On that score, Ukraine has already achieved some success. The operation has electrified the Ukrainian and Western media while sparking alarm and fury in Russia.
  • A possible third aim could be to gain leverage in potential peace negotiations. Russian sources report that Ukrainian troops have begun digging in, suggesting Kyiv seeks to hold the captured territory at least temporarily.

4 replies on “Analysis: Ukraine’s bold and risky gamble in Kursk”

I am speculating in the direction of that this is an attack in which Nato is behind behind the screens and just want to see what Russia has and how it will respond.

I have the feeling that they are prepared to do something stupid and actually attack Russia with Nato forces.

I definitely see the US behind this. Which could mean NATO is to some degree as well. But how much?
It does seem to be a test of Russian response as well as a PR move.
Possibly, if it goes well a morale boost?

But, If this is NATO forces- we should expect things to get much worse..

I speculate Intelligence and planning. I wouldn’t be surprised if Nato Special Forces are in it which could be written off as Ukrainian in a worst case.

When it comes to a PR move argument. Some asinine excuse if you ask me, I repeat my previous statement, its for a test of Russian response. I wouldn’t be surprised if some backroom people are entertaining the idea to strike Russia when it is exhausted with Ukraine. And that this is just to convince that brass to commit to it.

Why you might ask, I speculate in 10 years time, maybe even way shorter. NATO won’t the resources to defeat the Eastern Block and lose their position of dominance. Because of a simple reason, People Power. They may invest in fancy AI drone technology, but the only thing that asinine path will take us is the development more Radiation weapons to kill the chip of said drone. (They want AI so it can pursue a high value target when the drone is disconnected from its operator through Jamming). I cannot express my displeasure enough.

Furthermore the longer this goes on, the more the idea of a nuclear deterrent just being smoke and mirrors gains. That is the only logical explanation I can think of.

Hey Kaz
Yah, NATO special forces could be involved. Can’t see why not.
Regarding PR move- it’s interesting that today, days after this all began, we get Zelensky admitting to the incursion
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/zelenskyy-ukraine-invastion-kursk-1.7291574
He claims it’s to put pressure on Russia to negotiate? As if this will push Russia to negotiate? This doesn’t make sense. The situation will be dealt with, not through negotiation.

Btw: Zaparozhia power plant is on fire- one of the cooling towers is burning
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/russia-ukraine-war/fire-breaks-out-in-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power-plant-ukrainian-official-says-operating-as-normal/3301221
The plant is in shutdown– and as before Ukraine was the likely instigator

“I wouldn’t be surprised if some backroom people are entertaining the idea to strike Russia when it is exhausted with Ukraine. And that this is just to convince that brass to commit to it.”

I can see that as a possibility- While Russia’s distracted in Kursk region, hit somewhere else.

Leave a Reply

PFYT2