Where’s Orsk? New name to me!
Washington Post via archive.ph
“These sites have not been involved in supporting Russia’s war against Ukraine,” the U.S. official said. “But they are sensitive locations because Russia could perceive that its strategic deterrent capabilities are being targeted, which could undermine Russia’s ability to maintain nuclear deterrence against the United States.”
“The United States is concerned about Ukraine’s recent strikes against Russian ballistic missile early-warning sites,” said a U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.
Were Russia’s early-warning capabilities to be blinded by Ukrainian attacks, even in part, that could hurt strategic stability between Washington and Moscow, the U.S. official said.
The official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive security matter, confirmed that Ukraine’s Military Intelligence Directorate, known by its initials as GUR, was responsible for the strikes.
I won’t assume the US has no intention of using nuclear weapons against Russia. In fact these questionable strikes give the impression that the US could be planning to do just that using Ukraine to provide plausible deniability!
Really questioning the erroneous conviction claim?
Some analysts were puzzled at the targets: While Krasnodar is close enough to Ukraine to track missiles and drones, the radar station near Orsk is focused on the Middle East and China, they said.
Asked why they would target a site so far away, the Ukrainian official asserted that Russia “switched all of its capabilities for war against Ukraine.”
That doesn’t seem plausible?
Kyiv, meanwhile, has with increasing frequency targeted sites deep in Russia — a capability many doubted was possible without Western support and sign-off.
9 replies on “Is the US aiding Ukraine in targeting Russia’s ballistic missile early warning system?”
Moving a comment with links from Mark below:
Marksays:
May 30, 2024 at 10:34 am • Edit
This does nor make me feel proud.,,,
Canada goes along with NATO threats
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/canada-permits-strikes-on-military-targets-inside-russia/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://news.liga.net/en/all/news/kanada-razreshila-ispolzovat-svoe-oruzhie-dlya-udarov-po-tselyam-v-rossii&ved=2ahUKEwig6u__x7WGAxV1OTQIHQJdCLcQxfQBKAB6BAgPEAE&usg=AOvVaw1o6v2Et_lCjgYdAUbyLnqU
Interesting that the thinking for this move is – Russia has no red lines, so, we’re okay with our (Canadian) weapons being used to target Russia
Melanie Joly “She also noted that Russia currently has no red lines that could prevent the transferred weapons from being used for the legitimate defense of Ukraine’s territory.”
btw: Joe Biden is also okay with American weapons being used to strike Russian territory- so we’re looking at a coordination NATO move-
https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/biden-partially-lifts-ban-on-ukraine-using-u-s-arms-in-strikes-on-russian-territory-u-s-officials-say-1.6907346
So the NATO involvement is looking much more overt than it has been, in my opinion.
Coupled with the strikes on Russia long range monitoring systems by Ukraine suggests that the US did aid Ukraine with those strikes and there is a real possibility that missiles could strike Russia- long range missiles- very long range missiles (not from Ukraine)
we can see the ante is being upped- I’m thinking this is undeniable at this point in time
Hi Penny:
Here’s a bunch of stuff about Orsk:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=Orsk&atb=v394-1&ia=web
I sure wouldn’t want to be living there right now.
Re NATO connection: As far as I’m concerned, Canada’s been at war with Russia for quite some time now, starting in Feb 2023 when Trudeau shipped a bunch of tanks to Ukraine. It seems Canadians have been okay with that from the git-go. NATO good; Russia bad.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=canada+ships+tanks+to+Ukraine&atb=v394-1&ia=web
Hey Corrine- Sadly way to many Canadians are okay with war-
Because Canadians like to think of themselves as do gooders in the world-
Not the case.
Not the case at all.
thanks for the links
And thus the scene is set for World War 3.
It’s looking that way- I’m not liking it!
I am not liking it either. But they kept poking all over the world without consequences. Now they are poking something that will remember them what it means to fear.
🙁
But, I do understand what your saying. It’s one thing for the US to run over countries like Iraq, Syria, Libya..
It’s quite another thing to attempt to run over Russia.