As mentioned the other day, it seems to me the US is going to go for Greenland- And Canada will be surrounded. This is planned. As a Canadian I’m less than happy about these moves being made at all. I’m not certain they will be successful, but, the US is definitely going down this road, in my opinion. Maybe you feel differently? Share your thoughts.
The era of allowing strategic rivals like China and Russia to gain footholds in America’s backyard is over. The Monroe Doctrine is back, it is on steroids, and its next target is the largest island on Earth.
This is not a whim. It is a cold, calculated response to a world that has fundamentally changed.
The United States is facing a dual crisis of existential proportions:
an external threat from a newly emboldened China-Russia-BRICS axis that is consolidating control over the Eurasian landmass and its vast resources
and an internal crisis of a fiat currency teetering on the brink of collapse. In this new reality, the old globalist framework is a suicide pact. The only rational move is to retreat, consolidate, and build a resource-fortified empire; a Fortress America. And Greenland is the keystone of that fortress.
Let’s Dig Into The Following:
A new power bloc has arisen to challenge American hegemony. They are amassing population, industrial might, and, most importantly, a colossal share of the world’s natural resources. As this Eurasian bloc solidifies, it puts the United States in a perilous position: a future where its access to the critical minerals and energy needed to function can be cut off at will by its primary adversaries. How the gameboard has changed, and why America must now aggressively shore up its weaknesses!
Greenland is, quite simply, one of the most strategically important and resource-rich pieces of real estate on the planet. It is a resource superpower and an unsinkable aircraft carrier rolled into one. For a nation facing a dual crisis of external resource competition and internal monetary decay, the U.S. “acquisition” of Greenland is not merely an opportunity; why it is the single most important strategic move on the board, a masterstroke that solves multiple existential problems at once!
The Trump administration is not planning a military invasion, at least not initially. The strategy is far more subtle and, arguably, more brilliant. As outlined by The Economist, the plan is to bypass Copenhagen entirely and deal directly with the government in Nuuk, Greenland. Why it’s a narrative designed to drive a wedge between Greenland and Denmark, and making this offer almost impossible for the Greenlandic people to refuse!
If a NATO member’s sovereign territory can be effectively annexed by the alliance’s leader, then the alliance is meaningless. None of this is lost on President Trump. The Trump Administration has long viewed NATO as a parasitic arrangement, a drain on American resources that forces the U.S. to underwrite the defense of nations that refuse to pay their own way. Why forcing a crisis that leads to the dissolution of NATO, or at least America’s withdrawal from it, would be seen as a major victory, freeing the U.S. to focus on its own hemispheric defense!
Once Greenland is under American control, Canada will be completely surrounded by the United States. Alaska to the west, the continental U.S. to the south, and a new American Greenland to the east and north. That gaping hole in the center of Fortress America becomes untenable. Why Canada, with its vast resources, massive landmass, and minuscule military, becomes the next logical target for integration!
And the annexation of Greenland is not an act of aggression for aggression’s sake; it is a desperate, calculated, and necessary move in a global struggle for survival. Again, it’s existential! Why it checks every box!This isn’t the entire piece- this is all that can be accessed unpaid- It’s enough to understand where this is headed. Perhaps not successfully, but, the US is definitely going in this direction.