Comments on: PCR covid tests are not very useful. Focus on rapid antigen tests instead.

By: penny2

penny2 — Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:01:25 +0000

In reply to penny2.

I can see the ability to manipulate the results with them?

CORRECTION
I CANNOT see the ability to manipulate the results with them

By: penny2

penny2 — Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:00:15 +0000

In reply to BMan.

Hey BMan: believe me I understand your concerns.
Here’s one difference between the two that makes, I think, the difference.

The PCR test was manipulated based on the numbers of cycles that were done- we know anything over 25 was pretty much dead material (not indicating contagiousness)
Yet the test was regularly cycled at 35, 45 and higher.
That’s how the high case numbers were attained.

The RAT test is swab your nose, use the solution, wait and your done.
I can see the ability to manipulate the results with them?

By: BMan

BMan — Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:23 +0000

So, I have been pondering how we might know that these tests work any better than the PCR (which we know was used for false positives to run up the fear factor).

What is the methodology? Why wasn’t it used to begin with?

At this point, we (you and I and others who have paid attention) should NEVER trust the official pronouncements regarding this scamdemic. If they have been lying about the PCR test for this long (about 2 years or more), then why in hell would we believe what they say now?

I mean, if they have knowingly used a bogus test for the numbers, why would I think they won’t do the same with this test?