The original and actual topic is there is no evidence. It’s an irrelevant claim to imply there is no conclusive evidence. There is simply no evidence at all. Period. Not circumstantial- Not documentary. Not demonstrative. Nothing

Washington Post

World leaders were quick to blame ( guilt via media propaganda) Moscow for explosions along the undersea natural gas pipelines. But some Western officials now doubt the Kremlin was responsible.

But now, after months of investigation, numerous officials privately say that Russia may not be to blame after all for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines.

Some went so far as to say they didn’t think Russia was responsible.

But even those with inside knowledge of the forensic details don’t tie Russia to the attack, officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to share information about the progress of the investigation, some of which is based on classified intelligence.

Given the relatively shallow depth of the damaged pipelines — approximately 80 yards at the site of one explosion — a number of different actors could have pulled off the attack, possibly with the use of submersible drones or with the aid of surface ships, officials said.

The leaks occurred in the exclusive economic zones of Sweden and Denmark. European nations have been attempting to map which ships were in the region in the days before the explosions, in the hope of winnowing the field of suspects.

Makes the most sense to look at Sweden, Denmark and their allies.

How about a NATO partner?

“We know that this amount of explosives has to be a state-level actor,” Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto said in an interview this month. “It’s not just a single fisherman who decides to put the bomb there. It’s very professional.”

But a handful of officials expressed regret that so many world leaders pointed the finger at Moscow without considering other countries….

But as the investigation drags on, skeptics point out that Moscow had little to gain from damaging pipelines that fed Western Europe natural gas from Russia and generated billions of dollars in annual revenue.

No shit sherlock!

Always remember NATO’s reason for existing.

Lord Ismay

Lord Hastings Lionel Ismay was NATO’s first Secretary General, a position he was initially reluctant to accept. By the end of his tenure however, Ismay had become the biggest advocate of the organisation he had famously said earlier on in his political career, was created to “keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”

The more up to date version goes like this

Let’s call this disinformation of the worst most absurd type

I’m calling bullbiscuits on the claim this was done out of “spite”

Oh, really? No one in the West is interested in instability in the energy market? Isn’t that exactly why the “west” started their insane sanctions regime? How absurd doe these claims have to get?!

See here’s the thing…. I can think of others who would want more chaos in the gas market in Europe, right now.

Zelensky is on message- so it’s looking very much like an organized propaganda campaign- whatever actually occurred.

The pipelines exploded in Swedish and Danish waters- Highly suggestive of at least two parties that were involved in the explosions- which were likely anti Russian sabotage-

Official claims, most experts believe a sabotage operation, committed only by a state actor, by means of navy divers or with a submarine

In Swedish and Danish waters..

“There are two leaks on Nord Stream 1 – one in Swedish economic zone and one in Danish economic zone. They are very near each other,” a Swedish Maritime Administration (SMA) spokesperson told Reuters

No evidence what so ever. So it’s spin, hyperbole and bullshit.

This wasn’t Russia’s doing as already stated..

The pipelines were inactive. Russia had stopped delivery through them. It doesn't make sense to me they'd need to sabotage them,when for lack of a better term, these pipelines are OFF.