This past month (back to early May/22) I’m personally aware of numerous triple jabbed persons coming down with covid. Three shots and still getting infected. Clearly this is larger then my limited circle of acquaintances in Canada.
The same scenario is playing out in the US as well. Making my real world observations more than anecdotal

As COVID-19 cases began to accelerate again this spring, federal data suggests the rate of breakthrough COVID infections in April was worse in boosted Americans compared to unboosted Americans

“The new data do not mean booster shots are somehow increasing the risk. “

Oh, really? The new data could very well mean the booster shots are increasing the risk! There is no reason to assume this is not an issue. Other then from the purview (the scope of the influence or concerns of something) of big pharma profit promotion.

It also serves to illustrate a tricky reality facing health authorities amid the latest COVID-19 wave: even many boosted Americans are vulnerable to catching and spreading the virus, at a time when officials are wary of reimposing pandemic measures

“Meanwhile, federal officials are also preparing for key decisions on future COVID-19 vaccine shots, which might up the odds that additional shots might be able to fend off infections from the latest variants. “

If the third jab/first booster was not enough to fend off infection why would one assume a fourth or even fifth would? That’s bizarre.

Definition of insanity thinking or generating profits for big pharma? Or both?

BMJ

The drug company Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has expressed regret after court documents unsealed in talcum powder litigation showed that it funded a 1971 study in which Pennsylvania prison inmates, most of them black, were injected subcutaneously with asbestos.

The company paid Albert Kligman, a dermatologist who had recently invented the acne medicine tretinoin, to compare the effects of its talcum based Baby Powder on skin with the effects of chrysotile and tremolite asbestos.

Many of the studies carried out by Kligman at Holmesburg Prison in the 1960s and ’70s are already public knowledge, but J&J’s involvement had gone largely unnoticed.

Ten prisoners were paid as little as $10 to receive injections of talcum and of both types of asbestos in their lower backs to study skin reactions. Chrysotile asbestos, generally recognised as the most dangerous form, …

Related: Johnson & Johnson knew for decades talcum powder contained asbestos, reports allege

Executives at Johnson & Johnson repeatedly discussed their worries about the potential health effects of asbestos contamination of their talcum Baby Powder even as they told regulators and the public that all their tests were finding none.

But J&J ‘regrets’ their human experimentation. As they continued to lie and cover up for decades.

Phooey!

Contained within this post is the second of a 3 part series presented by the Academy of Ideas.

You can find the first part below:

Social Media: Why it Sickens the Mind/Divides Society

Now for Part 2

Part 3 will be featured here when available.