---
title: "Feces in a Finnish Toilet- When evidence of Russian Hybrid warfare is wafer thin"
type: "post"
post_id: "14740"
slug: "feces-in-finnish-toilet-when-evidence-of-russian-hybrid-warfare-is-wafer-thin"
canonical: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2026/10/26/feces-in-finnish-toilet-when-evidence-of-russian-hybrid-warfare-is-wafer-thin/"
markdown_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2026/10/26/feces-in-finnish-toilet-when-evidence-of-russian-hybrid-warfare-is-wafer-thin.md"
json_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2026/10/26/feces-in-finnish-toilet-when-evidence-of-russian-hybrid-warfare-is-wafer-thin.json"
txt_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2026/10/26/feces-in-finnish-toilet-when-evidence-of-russian-hybrid-warfare-is-wafer-thin.txt"
published: "2026-10-26T13:11:14+00:00"
modified: "2026-10-26T13:12:58+00:00"
author: "penny2"
categories:
  - "Uncategorized"
tags:
  - "Finland"
  - "perception management"
  - "Russia"
site_name: "PFYT2"
publisher: ""
language: "en-US"
generator: "easyPress Markdown"
generator_version: "1.0.6"
---
**Any evidence of Russian”Hybrid” Warfare is so thin, western media is resorting to nonsensical poop terrorism- fecal frights in Finland**

- **Originally reported by the Telegraph [and others](https://news.sbs.co.kr/english/article.do?news_id=N1008784691)**

> According to the British daily The Telegraph on the 6th (local time), as many as 20 Finnish lawmakers have reported that their homes **appeared to have been broken into** within just the past week.
> 
> In particular, **The Telegraph reported that one of these lawmakers discovered mysterious feces left in the toilet** of their home bathroom.
> 
> Police have launched an investigation into these break-in incidents.
> 
> Suspicion is spreading within Finnish political circles that Russia may be behind these incidents.

**I just can’t take sh\*t that seriously** 😉

[**Responsible Statecraft**](https://responsiblestatecraft.org/hybrid-warfare-russia)

**These days, barely a week goes by in Europe without a drone sighting, a fire or a power outage being blamed on Russia.** We’re told that these incidents are all part of a relentless, and escalating, “hybrid war” that Moscow is waging against the continent.

Tensions escalated dramatically last month after Germany formally attributed to Moscow **a “failed” drone attack on Leipzig/Halle airport.** But does the evidence support Western claims that Russia is engaged in a systematic hybrid war against Europe?

**Wrote about that nonsense here** **at the site**

> [Meeting between Putin, US envoys concludes in Moscow- Leipzig Airport False Flag](https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2026/09/05/meeting-between-putin-us-envoys-concludes-in-moscow-leipzig-airport-false-flag/)



> Various datasets and reports are regularly cited as evidence, including from Leiden University, the Soufan Center, the Associated Press and defense-related think tanks like the IISS, CSIS and GLOBSEC. Taken individually, each paints a bleak picture. Read side by side, however, they tell a very different story. **For starters, the numbers don’t add up: depending on the report, Russia has launched between 52 and 255 hybrid attacks in Europe since February 2022, a fivefold discrepancy for what is supposed to be the same campaign.**
> 
> The reason is that there is no agreed-upon definition of what a hybrid attack even is. **The IISS itself admits that the term is “amorphous.”** Some reports only count acts of physical sabotage; others include pro-Kremlin stickers, graffiti, peace demonstrations and even the Russian Navy passing through the English Channel. **In other words, it is a concept that can be used to include almost anything. Moreover, in most cases, the evidence linking Russia is very weak or, in fact, non-existent. Evidence of Russian responsibility usually consists of news articles reporting that Western officials suspect so. If a government claims “Russia did it,” the case ends up on the list.**
> 
> **Yet many of the most widely publicized cases of alleged Russian sabotage** — the “jamming” of the GPS signal of von der Leyen’s plane, the Baltic cable incidents in late 2024, a crashed DHL cargo plane, a fire at Heathrow Airport in 2025 — **ended up collapsing upon basic scrutiny. In each case, Russian involvement was ultimately ruled out.**
> 
> The **signal of von der Leyen’s plane, it turned out, was never lost.** The **Baltic cables were damaged by anchors dragged by Chinese- and Hong Kong-flagged ships, with investigators finding no evidence of intent**.
> 
> **The DHL crash in Vilnius was caused by pilot error, and the Heathrow fire by a fault in a substation that had been identified years earlier but never fixed.**But how many people actually know this, considering that such retractions generally receive a fraction of the coverage of the original allegations?
> 
> The same goes for the drone panic that swept Europe in the fall of 2025, when near-daily sightings caused the closure of several airports across the continent. Leaders openly blamed Moscow, yet virtually all the “Russian drone” sightings turned out to be unfounded: **a Dutch investigation of some 60 incidents found “much panic and hardly any evidence of Russian involvement,” with many sightings turning out to be hobby drones, planes, helicopters, satellites or even stars.**
> 
> **Where Russian drones have indeed entered NATO airspace — in Poland, Romania, Moldova and Lithuania — this has almost always occurred near the Ukrainian border, during attacks on Ukrainian targets. Even the Lithuanian president has stated that the latest such incident was likely caused by a drone that veered off course because of Ukrainian jamming. This appears much more like fallout from the war next door than a deliberate campaign of incursion**s. There was one incident where a Russian drone was shot down deep in Polish territory, but even in this case Western intelligence officials “privately” **admitted that the Russian incursion was probably not intentional.**

**Read entirely at the Responsible Statecraft link**
