Thank You Kaz
and I’m glad your still around, busy is good. But sometimes too busy isn’t.
bye for now 🙂

Still Here, just busy with overburdened with uni that I couldn’t really look at stuff. And since I pretty much think that I know how the story will go for the coming time there has been less urgency for me keep up as fervently as I did before.(Because I am overburdened with unit stuff)

When it comes to the subject at hand. I can’t recall exactly what I said about navally in the past. The only thing I can remember is that when he showed private estates of Putin that he embezzling etc. I was not really fazed. I might have said this before and I still stand behind it that Russia leadership works like one big organized syndicate.

Besides that I also made it my own policy not to care about the internal politics of countries of which I am not a member of. Because as an outsider you can be misled by some many actors that it is just safe to not be invested in their internal politics. The only the I care is, what is the mindset of said country, so I can somewhat expect how they will deal with stuff.

– Kaz

“Sorry I haven’t made myself clear – by ‘lab created foreign DNA’ I was not thinking of natural foreign DNA replicated in a lab (although that is bad enough wrt SV40 etc and I do understand your concern with that) but rather I was meaning synthetic DNA created in a lab using gene splicing techniques……”

Thanks for clarifying 🙂

Sorry I haven’t made myself clear – by ‘lab created foreign DNA’ I was not thinking of natural foreign DNA replicated in a lab (although that is bad enough wrt SV40 etc and I do understand your concern with that) but rather I was meaning synthetic DNA created in a lab using gene splicing techniques and that is orders of magnitude more dangerous in the hands of ‘scientists’ who have no reservations about playing god. The vector might well be bad but the synthetic DNA payload is the real horror.

I’ll now stop flogging this horse.

Gimlet Eye,
“the salient point, as I see it and what your linked article seems to gloss over, is that the virus vector (of whatever virus) is the delivery mechanism for lab created foreign DNA”

The foreign virus vector being the delivery is acknowledged in the article- section headlined (If I’m understanding this correctly?)

“Overcomes Pre-existing Immunity Towards Adenoviral Vectors Using Simian-derived Vectors

Simian derived vectors are used to overcome pre existing immunity to enable a response to be mounted by the immune system”

These vectors would be lab manufactured going as far back as the polio vaccine and SV-40 contamination (wrote about this a few times at my old place)

https://en.ssi.dk/-/media/arkiv/uk/news/epi-news/2001/pdf/epi-news—2001—no-8.pdf

“The use of kidney cell cultures from different
monkey species permitted the repli-cation of poliovirus in vitro”

These have been lab created ( kidney culture cells in the case of the polio virus) from at least that far back. Possibly further? I don’t know.

Then another vaccine which used a pig culture that has infected humans with pig dna, claimed to be harmless, but, who really knows?
Another one I covered back in the day

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/22/rotavirus.vaccine/index.html

“The contaminant material is DNA from porcine circovirus 1, a virus from pigs that is not known to cause disease in humans or animals, Hamburg said.”

My understanding is that vaccine remains contaminated to this day…

So long story short the replication of foreign dna, for vaccine manufacture, in the lab is a standard practice and has been used previously-

Does that make them (vaccines) safe or good? I don’t think so.

Is it introducing foreign genetic material into the human body?
Yes! Absolutely.

Do I believe this to be a good thing in general? No.

“the idea being our body is more familiar with these types of viruses so it mounts an immune response, quickly”
the salient point, as I see it and what your linked article seems to gloss over, is that the virus vector (of whatever virus) is the delivery mechanism for lab created foreign DNA. So, AstraZenika, Sputnik and J&J are DNA ‘vaccines’ rather than (m)RNA of pFizer etc. Still genetic, novel and untested all the same.

gallier2- “The timing of Navalny’s death is extremely convenient for the axis of evil. At what better time could this, now useless asset, since Russia neutralized its danger for a long time now, have died? It was impossible for the NED, CIA and other agent to polish that turd”

Exactly!

Regarding the piece on Navalny’s death-first comment

Live as a joke. Die as a joke.
Word is Navalny didn’t trust Russian vaccines and took American version. Another Death-Vax Kill-Shot Victim. American Style.

Interesting, but, can’t be proven or disproven

There is mention that his lawyer had visited him two days prior to his death..

What ever actually happened, the idea of what we are supposed to think about the situation, has been provided to us via our media. That’s undeniable.

My conclusions remain- natural causes or othewise- Navalny’s ship had sailed and his value in death is greater than alive- Cui Bono?
So far, it looks to be the NATO crew, led by the US.

Hey gallier2
I covered the embezzlement at the time- Yah, he was crooked. I don’t doubt that for a minute

Had to look up adenovirus to understand the use as vector in the sputnik- the term originates from viruses located in human adenoids, the idea being our body is more familiar with these types of viruses so it mounts an immune response, quickly.

However because we are immune to these adenovirus another simian derived vector may be used to stimulate the response
Digression- I get SV-40 flashbacks when I read this- increased cancer as that is a carcinogen

the manufacture of
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/CA/en/technical-documents/technical-article/pharmaceutical-and-biopharmaceutical-manufacturing/vaccine-manufacturing/adenovirus-vaccine-manufacturing-process

So Sputnik is not an mRNA vaccine. But it’s definitely as gross and disgusting as all other jabs