--- title: "Are Covid Jabs Fueling New Variants- Yes, Obviously!" type: "post" post_id: "3670" slug: "are-covid-jabs-fueling-new-variants-yes-obviously" canonical: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2023/01/05/are-covid-jabs-fueling-new-variants-yes-obviously/" markdown_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2023/01/05/are-covid-jabs-fueling-new-variants-yes-obviously.md" json_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2023/01/05/are-covid-jabs-fueling-new-variants-yes-obviously.json" txt_url: "https://pennyforyourthoughts2.ca/2023/01/05/are-covid-jabs-fueling-new-variants-yes-obviously.txt" published: "2023-01-05T21:16:22+00:00" modified: "2023-01-05T21:16:22+00:00" author: "penny2" categories: - "Uncategorized" tags: - "Big Pharma" - "Covid" - "perception management" - "state sponsored terrorism" site_name: "PFYT2" publisher: "" language: "en-US" generator: "easyPress Markdown" generator_version: "1.0.6" --- **And some of us have been talking this topic for a good long time…. The so called “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-vaxxers” call it as it is! Again!** #### [WSJ](https://archive.ph/KwuFU) **@Archive.ph** > Public-health experts are sounding the alarm about a new Omicron variant dubbed XBB that is rapidly spreading across the Northeast U.S. Some [studies](https://archive.ph/o/KwuFU/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05644-7) suggest it is as [different](https://archive.ph/KwuFU#selection-287.0-397.363) from the original Covid strain from Wuhan as the 2003 SARS virus. Should Americans be worried? > > It isn’t clear that XBB is any more lethal than other variants, but its mutations enable it to evade antibodies from prior infection and vaccines as well as existing monoclonal antibody treatments. > > > **`Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the virus’s rapid evolution.`** Prior to Omicron’s emergence in November 2021, there were only four variants of concern: Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma. Only Alpha and Delta caused surges of infections globally. But Omicron has begotten numerous descendents, many of which have popped up in different regions of the world curiously bearing some of the same mutations. “Such rapid and simultaneous emergence of multiple variants with enormous growth advantages is unprecedented,” a Dec. 19 [study](https://archive.ph/o/KwuFU/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05644-7) in the journal Nature notes. Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have developed mutations that enable it to transmit more easily and escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection. > **The same study posits that immune imprinting may be contributing to the viral evolution. Vaccines do a good job of training the immune system to remember and knock out the original Wuhan variant. But when new and markedly different strains come along, the immune system responds less effectively.** Bivalent vaccines that target the Wuhan and BA.5 variants (or breakthrough infections with the latter) prompt the immune system to produce antibodies that target viral regions the two strains have in common. In Darwinian terms, mutations that allow the virus to evade common antibodies win out—they make it “fitter.” XBB has evolved to elude antibodies induced by the vaccines and breakthrough infections. Hence, the Nature study suggests, “current herd immunity and BA.5 vaccine boosters may not efficiently prevent the infection of Omicron convergent variants.” > **A New England Journal of Medicine [study](https://archive.ph/o/KwuFU/https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2214293) published last month provides more evidence of the vulnerability caused by immune imprinting. Neutralizing antibodies of people who had received the bivalent were 26 times as high against the original Wuhan variant as they were against XBB and four times as high as they were against Omicron and the BA.5 variant.** Similarly, a [study](https://archive.ph/o/KwuFU/https://www.cell.com/cell/pdf/S0092-8674(22)01531-8.pdf?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867422015318?showall=true) this month in the journal Cell found that antibody levels of people who had received four shots were 145 times as high against the original Wuhan strain as the XBB variant. A bivalent booster only slightly increased antibodies against XBB. > **`Experts nevertheless claim that boosters improve protection against XBB. That’s disinformation, to use their favored term.`** **Oh there has been lots of disinfo pushed by the jabamaniacs!** > **Notably, workers who had received more doses were at higher risk of getting sick. Those who received three more doses were 3.4 times as likely to get infected as the unvaccinated, while those who received two were only 2.6 times as likely.** > **“This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19,” the [authors noted](https://archive.ph/o/KwuFU/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1).** > > “We still have a lot to learn about *protection* (**lack there of and more accurately HARM)** from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine **`whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.”`** > > **The Biden administration’s `monomaniacal `*(**Fanatical, or obsessed with one cause or idea to the exclusion of other concerns*****) **focus on vaccines over new treatments has left the highest-risk Americans more vulnerable to new variants. Why doesn’t that seem to worry the experts?** Fauci LIED ---------- Jacinda Arden LIED ------------------ Biden LIED. ------------ Trudeau LIED. ------------- Bill Gates LIED --------------- **Add to the list!**